|
We
All Have a Story of Our Life
We all have a story of our life. We invent, adopt, are led by and measure
ourselves against our personal narratives. These are, normally, commensurate
with our personal histories, our predilections, our abilities, limitations, and
our skills. We are not likely to invent a narrative which is wildly out of synch
with ourselves.
We rarely judge ourselves by a narrative which is not somehow correlated to
what we can reasonably expect to achieve. In other words, we are not
likely to frustrate and punish ourselves knowingly. As we grow older, our
narrative changes. Parts of it are realized and this increases our
self-confidence, sense of self-worth and self-esteem and makes us feel
fulfilled, satisfied, and at peace with ourselves.
The narcissist differs from normal people in that his is a "highly"
unrealistic personal narrative. This choice could be imposed and
inculcated by a sadistic and hateful Primary Object (a narcissistic, domineering
mother, for instance) – or it could be the product of the narcissist's own
tortured psyche. Instead of realistic expectations of himself, the
narcissist has grandiose fantasies. The latter cannot be effectively
pursued. They are elusive, ever receding targets.
This constant failure (the Grandiosity Gap) leads to dysphoria (bouts of
sadness) and to losses. Observed from the outside, the narcissist is
perceived to be odd, prone to illusions and self-delusions and, therefore,
lacking in judgment.
The dysphoria – the bitter fruits of the narcissist's impossible demands of
himself – are painful. Gradually the narcissist learns to avoid them by
eschewing a structured narrative altogether. Life's disappointments and
setbacks condition him to understand that his specific "brand" of
unrealistic narrative inevitably leads to frustration, sadness and agony and is
a form of self-punishment (inflicted on him by his sadistic, rigid Superego).
This incessant punishment serves another purpose: to support and confirm the
negative judgment meted out by the narcissist's Primary Objects (usually, by his
parents or care givers) in his early childhood (now, an inseparable part of his
Superego).
The narcissist's mother, for instance, may have consistently insisted that
the narcissist is bad, rotten, or useless. Surely, she could not have been
wrong, goes the narcissist's internal dialog. Even raising the possibility
that she may have been wrong proves her right! The narcissist feels
compelled to validate her verdict by making sure that he indeed "becomes"
bad, rotten and useless.
Yet, no human being – however deformed – can live without a
narrative. The narcissist develops circular, ad-hoc, circumstantial, and
fantastic "life-stories" (the Contingent Narratives). Their role
is to avoid confrontation with (the often disappointing and disillusioning)
reality. He thus reduces the number of dysphoria and their strength,
though he usually fails to avoid the Narcissistic Cycle.
The narcissist pays a heavy price for accommodating his dysfunctional
narratives:
Emptiness, existential loneliness (he shares no common psychic ground with
other humans), sadness, drifting, emotional absence, emotional platitude, mechanization/robotization
(lack of anima, excess persona in Jung's terms) and meaninglessness. This
fuels his envy and the resulting rage and amplifies the EIPM (Emotional
Involvement Preventive Measures). The narcissist develop a "Zu Leicht
– Zu Schwer" ("Too Easy – Too difficult") syndrome:
On the one hand, the narcissist's life is unbearably difficult. The few
real achievements he does have should normally have mitigated this perceived
harshness. But, in order to preserve his sense of omnipotence, he is
forced to "downgrade" these accomplishments by labeling them as
"too easy".
The narcissist cannot admit that he had toiled to achieve something and, with
this confession, shatter his grandiose False-Self. He must belittle every
achievement of his and make it appear to be a routine triviality. This is
intended to support the dreamland quality of his fragmented personality.
But it also prevents him from deriving the psychological benefits which usually
accrue to goal attainment: an enhancement of self-confidence, a more realistic
self-assessment of one's capabilities and abilities, a strengthening sense of
self-worth.
The narcissist is doomed to roam a circular labyrinth. When he does
achieve something – he demotes it in order to enhance his own sense of
omnipotence, perfection, and brilliance. When he fails, he dares not face
reality. He escapes to the land of no narratives where life is nothing but
a meaningless wasteland. The narcissist whiles his life away.
But what is it like being a narcissist? The narcissist is often
anxious. It is usually unconscious, like a nagging pain, a permanence,
like being immersed in a gelatinous liquid, trapped and helpless, or as the DSM
puts it, narcissism is "all-pervasive." Still, these anxieties
are never diffuse. The narcissist worries about specific people, or
possible events, or more or less plausible scenarios. He seems to
constantly conjure up some reason or another to be worried or offended.
Positive past experiences do not ameliorate this preoccupation. The
narcissist believes that the world is hostile, a cruelly arbitrary, ominously
contrarian, contrivingly cunning and indifferently crushing place. The
narcissist simply "knows" it will all end badly and for no good
reason. Life is too good to be true and too bad to endure.
Civilization is an ideal and the deviations from it are what we call
"history." The narcissist is incurably pessimistic, an ignoramus
by choice and incorrigibly blind to any evidence to the contrary.
Underneath all this, there is a Generalized Anxiety. The narcissist
fears life and what people do to each other. He fears his fear and what it
does to him. He knows that he is a participant in a game whose rules he
will never master and in which his very existence is at stake. He trusts
no one, believes in nothing, knows only two certainties: evil exists and life is
meaningless. He is convinced that no one cares.
This existential angst that permeates his every cell is atavistic and
irrational. It has no name or likeness. It is like the monsters in
every child's bedroom with the lights turned off. But being the
rationalizing and intellectualizing creatures that cerebral narcissists are –
they instantly label this unease, explain it away, analyze it and attempt to
predict its onset.
They attribute this poisonous presence to some external cause. They set
it in a pattern, embed it in a context, transform it into a link in the great
chain of being. Hence, they transform diffuse anxiety into focused
worries. Worries are known and measurable quantities. They have
reasons which can be tackled and eliminated. They have a beginning and an
end. They are linked to names, to places, faces and to people.
Worries are human.
Thus, the narcissist transforms his demons into compulsive notations in his
real or mental diary: check this, do that, apply preventive measures, do not
allow, pursue, attack, avoid. The narcissist ritualizes both his
discomfort and his attempts to cope with it.
But such excessive worrying – whose sole intent is to convert irrational
anxiety into the mundane and tangible – is the stuff of paranoia.
For what is paranoia if not the attribution of inner disintegration to
external persecution, the assignment of malevolent agents from the outside to
the figments of turmoil inside? The paranoid seeks to alleviate his own
voiding by irrationally clinging to rationality. Things are so bad, he
says, mainly to himself, because I am a victim, because "they" are
after me and I am hunted by the juggernaut of state, or by the Freemasons, or by
the Jews, or by the neighborhood librarian. This is the path that leads
from the cloud of anxiety, through the lamp-posts of worry to the consuming
darkness of paranoia.
Paranoia is a defense against anxiety and against aggression. In the
paranoid state, the latter is projected outwards, upon imaginary others, the
instruments of one's crucifixion.
Anxiety is also a defense against aggressive impulses. Therefore,
anxiety and paranoia are sisters, the latter merely a focused form of the
former. The mentally disordered defend against their own aggressive
propensities by either being anxious or by becoming paranoid.
Yet, aggression has numerous guises, not only anxiety and paranoia. One
of its favorite disguises is boredom. Like its relation, depression,
boredom is aggression directed inwards. It threatens to drown the bored
person in a primordial soup of inaction and energy depletion. It is an
hedonic (pleasure depriving) and dysphoric (leads to profound sadness).
But it is also threatening, perhaps because it is so reminiscent of death.
Not surprisingly, the narcissist is most worried when bored. The
narcissist is aggressive. He channels his aggression and internalizes
it. He experiences his bottled wrath as boredom.
When the narcissist is bored, he feels threatened by his ennui in a vague,
mysterious way. Anxiety ensues. He rushes to construct an
intellectual edifice to accommodate all these primitive emotions and their
transubstantiations. He identifies reasons, causes, effects and
possibilities in the outer world. He builds scenarios. He spins
narratives. As a result, he feels no more anxiety. He has identified
the enemy (or so he thinks). And now, instead of being anxious, he is
simply worried. Or paranoid.
The narcissist often strikes people as "laid back" – or, less
charitably: lazy, parasitic, spoiled, and self-indulgent. But, as usual
with narcissists, appearances deceive. Narcissists are either compulsively
driven over-achievers – or chronic under-achieving wastrels. Most of
them fail to make full and productive use of their potential and
capacities. Many avoid even the now standard paths of an academic degree,
a career, or family life.
The disparity between the accomplishments of the narcissist and his grandiose
fantasies and inflated self image – the Grandiosity Gap – is staggering and,
in the long run, unsustainable. It imposes onerous exigencies on the
narcissist's grasp of reality and on his meager social skills. It pushes
him either to reclusion or to a frenzy of "acquisitions" – cars,
women, wealth, power.
Yet, no matter how successful the narcissist is – many of them end up being
abject failures – the Grandiosity Gap can never be bridged. The
narcissist's False-Self is so unrealistic and his Superego so sadistic that
there is nothing the narcissist can do to extricate himself from the Kafkaesque
trial that is his life.
The narcissist is a slave to his own inertia. Some narcissists are
forever accelerating on the way to ever higher peaks and ever greener
pastures. Others succumb to numbing routines, the expenditure of minimal
energy, and to preying on the vulnerable. But either way, the narcissist's
life is out of control, at the mercy of pitiless inner voices and internal
forces.
Narcissists are one-state machines, programmed to extract Narcissistic Supply
from others. To do so, they develop early on a set of immutable
routines. This propensity for repetition, inability to change and rigidity
confine the narcissist, stunt his development, and limit his horizons. Add
to this his overpowering sense of entitlement, his visceral fear of failure, and
his invariable need to both feel unique and be perceived as such – and one
often ends up with a recipe for inaction.
The under-achieving narcissist dodges challenges, eludes tests, shirks
competition, sidesteps expectations, ducks responsibilities, evades authority
– because he is afraid to fail and because doing something everyone else does
endangers his sense of uniqueness. Hence the narcissist's apparent
"laziness" and "parasitism." His sense of entitlement
– with no commensurate accomplishments or investment – irritates his social
milieu. People tend to regard such narcissists as "spoiled
brats".
In specious contrast, the over-achieving narcissist seeks challenges and
risks, provokes competition, embellishes expectations, aggressively bids for
responsibilities and authority and seems to be possessed with an eerie
self-confidence. People tend to regard such specimens as
"entrepreneurial", "daring", "visionary", or
"tyrannical." Yet, these narcissists too are mortified by
potential failure, driven by a strong conviction of entitlement, and strive to
be unique and be perceived as such.
Their hyperactivity is merely the flip side of the under-achiever's
inactivity: it is as fallacious and as empty and as doomed to miscarriage and
disgrace. It is often sterile or illusory, all smoke and mirrors rather
than substance. The precarious "achievements" of such
narcissists invariably unravel. They often act outside the law or social
norms. Their industriousness, workaholism, ambition, and commitment are
intended to disguise their essential inability to produce and build.
Theirs is a whistle in the dark, a pretension, a Potemkin life, all make-believe
and thunder.
A Philosophical Comment about Shame
The Grandiosity Gap is the difference between self-image–the way the
narcissist perceives himself–and contravening cues from reality. The
greater the conflict between grandiosity and reality, the bigger the gap and the
greater the narcissist's feelings of shame and guilt.
There are two varieties of shame:
Narcissistic Shame – which is the narcissist's experience of the
Grandiosity Gap (and its affective correlate). Subjectively it is
experienced as a pervasive feeling of worthlessness (the dysfunctional
regulation of self-worth is the crux of pathological narcissism),
"invisibleness" and ridiculousness. The patient feels pathetic
and foolish, deserving of mockery and humiliation.
Narcissists adopt all kinds of defenses to counter narcissistic shame.
They develop addictive, reckless, or impulsive behaviors. They deny,
withdraw, rage, or engage in the compulsive pursuit of some kind of
(unattainable, of course) perfection. They display haughtiness and
exhibitionism and so on. All these defenses are primitive and involve
splitting, projection, projective identification, and intellectualization.
The second type of shame is Self-Related. It is a result of the
gap between the narcissist's grandiose Ego-Ideal and his Self or Ego. This
is a well-known concept of shame and it has been explored widely in the works of
Freud [1914], Reich [1960], Jacobson [1964], Kohut [1977], Kingston [1983],
Spero [1984] and Morrison [1989].
One must draw a clear distinction between guilt (or control)–related
shame and conformity-related shame.
Guilt is an "objectively" determinable philosophical entity (given
relevant knowledge regarding the society and culture in question). It is
context-dependent. It is the derivative of an underlying assumption by "others"
that a Moral Agent exerts control over certain aspects of the world. This
assumed control by the agent imputes guilt to it, if it acts in a manner
incommensurate with prevailing morals, or refrains from acting in a manner
commensurate with them.
Shame, in this case, here is an outcome of the "actual"
occurrence of "avoidable" outcomes–events which impute guilt
to a Moral Agent who acted wrongly or refrained from acting.
We must distinguish "guilt" from "guilt feelings,"
though. Guilt follows events. Guilt feelings can precede them.
Guilt feelings (and the attaching shame) can be "anticipatory."
Moral Agents assume that they control certain aspects of the world. This
makes them able to predict the outcomes of their "intentions"
and feel guilt and shame as a result - even if nothing happened!
Guilt Feelings are composed of a component of Fear and a component of
Anxiety. Fear is related to the external, objective, observable consequences of
actions or inaction by the Moral Agent. Anxiety has to do with "inner"
consequences. It is ego-dystonic and threatens the identity of the
Moral-Agent because being Moral is an important part of it. The internalization
of guilt feelings leads to a shame reaction.
Thus, shame has to do with guilty feelings, not with "guilt,"
per se. To reiterate, "guilt" is determined by the
reactions and anticipated reactions of others to external outcomes such as
avoidable waste or preventable failure (the FEAR component). "Guilty
feelings" are the reactions and anticipated reactions of the
Moral-Agent itself to internal outcomes (helplessness or loss of presumed
control, narcissistic injuries – the ANXIETY component).
There is also "conformity-related shame." It has to do
with the narcissist's feeling of "otherness." It similarly
involves a component of fear (of the reactions of others to one's otherness) and
of anxiety (of the reactions of oneself to one's otherness).
Guilt-related shame is connected to self-related shame (perhaps through a
psychic construct akin to the Superego). Conformity-related shame is more
akin to narcissistic shame.
Contact us for more info
|